
Not so long ago, I went for a teaching interview. The panel asked excellent questions, including, "It says on your CV that you're a widely published author. What sort of fiction do you write?" I explained that, among other things, I wrote about sexuality, and this was work I truly believed in. Connecting with others and dispelling shame is what I'm all about.
The woman who'd voiced the question gave me a serious look. "But when you're working with teenagers," she said, "do you talk about sexuality?"
"Well," I began, "if we were studying a love poem by W. H. Auden, I might raise the fact that Auden was gay, and that the students shouldn't assume the poet was addressing a woman." I went on to talk about Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet, and how, though Juliet is only aged thirteen, she falls in erotic love and willingly has sex. "Our young people must learn to question pressure," I said, "while also understanding that they're responsible for their bodies. Stories are an excellent way of raising this sort of debate. So yes," I added, "I talk about sexuality. But sexual feelings? No. It's a classroom, after all."
The panelist had asked a reasonable question, of course, but I'm looking at it from the other side of the fence. I'd never want a child of mine left in the hands of a teacher who, when the subject of sexuality arose, wouldn't address the matter. If kids are going to read adult texts, such as Shakespeare's R&J, then I want them with a teacher who isn't afraid to be wise. Confusion about sexual needs is rife amongst our teenagers, which is why unwanted pregnancies are on the rise along with the spread of sexual disease...and that's before we've even mentioned self-esteem! Please, oh please, let our young folks be taught by someone who isn't afraid.
I have been a pastoral tutor for classes of British teenagers, where talking about sexuality was part of my job. Kids giggle when you first mention it and make a load of jokes, but as soon as they see that you're serious, the questions begin. They're important questions, thoughtful questions, down-to-earth and smart. These students are more mature than we realize.
But back to the interview panel. See, the panelist seemed to assume that sexuality was dirty, and that if I spoke about it, then I might be dirty too. I swear, the idea that a talk about sex might simply address identity hadn't so much as entered the woman's head. It seems she was stuck on the topic of arousal, when that's really just one part of it. Truth is, the more we believe that sex is bad and gross, the more we encourage repression and harm -- and these, I argue, are the stuff that damage is made of.
Some day, I hope I'll be on an interview panel asking the very same question. And the answer I'll want will be something like this: "I'd talk with teenagers about sexuality just the same as I'd talk about love."















